2 Fujifilm Prime Lenses Only

One of the most discussed subjects related to photographic gear is also one of the oldest and most ardent, ever: prime lenses, or zoom lenses? I did write my impressions on this subject before and as long as we are so different and our needs in photography are so unique and vast, there is no “right” or “wrong” with either fixed, or zoom lenses.  Since I made the switch from DSLR to Fujifilm, things got significantly easier (in terms of weight and size) and more delightful (in terms of usability, ergonomics and gear design) for me and for the way I approach photography.

XF 35mm F1.4 R

Since using Fujifilm cameras and lenses for some years, it became like second nature. The way those tools are designed fits more and more my changing and maturing process of making photography. They say as you grow older, times passes faster and this will forge some significant changes in the personal style. We have less and less time for photography, for connecting ourselves to the core of the important things we need to experience. As we go along in our photographic endeavours and we refine our style by acquiring more knowledge (including new and more detailed post-processing techniques, new softwares, new gear, etc.) we find out that there isn’t enough time for shooting; most of the time we could dedicate to photography is spent on post-processing, sorting, archiving, posting our best on social media networks and so on.

XF 23mm F2.0 R WR

As I said in a previous article on the need of freedom, we should cherish the time for the actual photographic process. Actually it’s not “shooting”; this word doesn’t fully describe it. I prefer to elaborate a little, this “shooting” action; because we need to draw a line between taking photos and making photographs. And if we are talking about making photography, then that process is about:

  1. what you see;

  2. what you feel about the scenery / action / person you are looking at, in that moment, that will become your subject, your story;

  3. the camera settings;

  4. the composition;

  5. the recording of the moment – pressing the shutter button.

We have less time for this. And the available time is even shorter when you could miss the moment because you might be carrying a lot more than necessary in your photo bag. Having too much could mean not knowing what camera, what filter, on what lens would be perfectly fit to capture that moment. The reality is the perfection is not in the gear you are using and how pro-level it is, but it is in the moment itself and your ability / inspiration to actually capture it (even in an imperfect way, with imperfect means).

XF 35mm F1.4 R

To be able to capture the moment, be ready for whatever interesting / ideal scene might be in front of you, to have less and to travel light might be the answer, as I see it. The minimal approach of “less is more” could be creatively essential. One camera, one lens, like the Fujifilm X100 series – what more could be said? When you have only one lens, you already set your mind to think and see the world in that one focal length (35 mm in Full Frame format, for the X100 series cameras) and try to make the best of if.

XF 23mm F2.0 R WR

But what if only 2 lenses would be everything you could bring? Or everything you own? Let’s consider 2 fixed lenses, for the sake of travelling light, keep the volume and weight of your photo bag to a minimum, but having at your disposal the best IQ, which is normally better than what a regular zoom lens could offer. What 2 fixed lenses would be best for your needs?

XF 35mm F1.4 R

For Fujifilm, you have the choice of several focal lengths: 14mm, 16mm, 18mm, 23mm, 27mm, 35mm, 50mm, 56mm, 60mm, 80mm and 90mm and soon a big 200mm F2.0 prime lens. I am referring to the X Mount lenses. In my opinion, a kit of 4 prime lenses would be:

The first: XF 14mm F2.8 or XF 16mm F1.4 WR

The second: XF 23mm F2.0 WR or XF 23 mm F1.4

The third: XF 35mm F2.0 WR or XF 35mm F1.4

The fourth: XF 50mm F2.0 WR or XF 56mm F1.2

For now, I only use 2 prime lenses and those are: XF 23mm F2.0 WR and XF 35mm F1.4 R. This “compact travel prime kit” is really good in covering the needs for a travelling photographer. They are good for landscape, street, architecture and environmental portrait photography. I love both of them for their compact size, great optical quality and also for the fact that they are different (I am not talking about the obvious differences like aperture and focal length). Let me explain:

XF 23mm F2.0 R WR

XF 35mm F1.4 R is a wonderful lens. It has a lot of character, beautiful bokeh, at F1.4 is a fast prime, very good for background separation, as well as for the photography in low light conditions. It is one of the first prime lenses for X Mount cameras, announced by Fujifilm in January 2012. Its colour rendition and sharpness, even at its maximum aperture are gorgeous. It isn’t one of the fastest lenses in AF speed, nor does it have the convenient weather sealing, but for its positive points, it’s worth a lot using it and having it.

XF 35mm F1.4 R

XF 23mm F2.0 R WR is even more compact. At F2.0 maximum aperture, that’s the minimum speed a quality prime lens should have (I wish XF 14mm should be F2.0, instead of F2.8). The new construction formula guarantees great sharpness and very fast and silent AF operation, plus being weather resistant. This focal length is great for travel and street photography and it makes it a nice companion for the other one. This is the last generation of compact, affordable, high quality modern prime lenses; this one was announced in August 2016.

XF 23mm F2.0 R WR

When I said they are different, I meant they come from different eras, if I may say so. One is weather sealed, but only F2.0, the other isn’t weather sealed, but it has a wonderful F1.4 aperture; they are built differently, even if they have a lot in common.

Instead of having a 2 prime lens kit with both focal lengths (23mm and 35mm) on the F1.4 version, or both on F2.0 WR version, I think that having one from each category could mean precisely that “best from both worlds” type of compromise. XF 35mm F2.0 WR wasn’t for me, from the start (this is just how I felt) and XF 23mm F1.4 R is a great lens, but even more expensive than the XF 35mm F1.4 R and I preferred the fast F1.4 aperture to be for a longer focal length (35mm, instead of 23mm) – a real benefit when using it for portraits.

XF 35mm F1.4 R

What would be your 2 prime lenses that could cover your needs in photography?

All photos and text – © Sebastian Boatca 2018 / www.sebastianboatca.com

You may also like


  1. Hi Sebastian, I really enjoyed this article and the lessons I picked up from it, especially the mix and match approach and the “lowest lens should be f2 at least”. So, on a sort of related note I would like to ask whether it is true that if I were to attach a legacy lens – say a 50 mm Pentax f1.8 – to my Fuji XT-1, I would also lose one stop of light, so it does not remain an f1.8. Is this correct? Thanks. John

    1. Thank you, John for your comment! I, too, love to use old manual focus lenses on my Fujifilm camera, via the proper adapter.
      Although we are quickly getting used to AF and multi-coating glass (for better contrast, less flare, less CA, etc.), there are still, out there, some amazing manual focus lenses that have plenty of character. In photography, it’s not always about sharpness. I feel sometimes this becomes more of a science and less of an art. Imperfections can have their charm.
      Regarding your question: A 50mm F1.8 lens on your X-T1 camera will have:
      1. The field compression of a 50mm lens;
      2. The field of view of a 75mm lens (in terms of Full-Frame coverage);
      3. The background separation (not exactly the bokeh) of a F1.8 X 1.5 (crop factor) = F2,7 – mathematically speaking;
      4. The light gathering capability of an F1.8 lens. At least here, things don’t change, theoretically.
      I am no expert in these things, but I hope this will help. 🙂 May the Light be with you!

  2. Bonjour Sébastien,

    Très bon article. Pour ma part je possède un X-Pro1 et le 35mm f1,4. J’ai pensé un moment prendre un deuxième objectif mais cela ne me réjouissait guère je n’y voyais personnellement pas l’intérêt (encombrement, poids, angle de vue). Je suis très ravi du 35mm et je ne m’en séparerais pas pour le moment. Mais je le répète c’est un choix tout à fait personnel. Concernant le boitier j’ai des vues sur le Xe-3 mais en regardant le manuel j’ai pu m’apercevoir qu’il y avait une quantité énorme de paramètres et de fonctions supplémentaires et j’en reviens à ce que tu as écrit, j’ai peur que cela soit au détriment de la spontanéité lors des prises de vue.
    Merci encore pour ton article plein de sagesse. 🙂

    1. Bonjour Gil,
      Merci beaucoup pour les commentaires. Je pense que tu as raison, en ce qui concerne la philosophie de garder tout le plus simple et intuitive possible. X-E3 est très intéressant, surtout pour ma femme, ou comme solution de backup (mon opinion). Je le trouve très compétant, même si les dimensions réduites ne sont pas le point fort, pour l’ergonomie, comme je l’ai vois. Et avec le X-E3 et le XF 35mm F1.4 (plus le XF 23mm F2.0 WR, éventuellement) tu pourrais garder la même philosophie de la simplicité.

  3. This is a well considered article. It might be a coincidence that I agree with the 2-lens philosophy, or it might be that I only have 2 lenses. When I saw how cheap the X-Pro1 was used I had to get one. I deliberately picked 2 lenses that would pair well for my needs and would last a long time. I opted for the 16 1.4 and the 23 1.4. I would have gone for something a little more wide-standard but the 27mm just wasn’t appealing, and the 35 is… too standard. If Fuji could update their 18mm or 27mm with a focusing scale that would be much appreciated. The only negative to the lenses I own are the size, and that is only occasionally a nuisance. Overall Fuji have a very impressive selection to pick from.

    1. Thanks for your comment. 16mm and 23mm are great lens and F1.4 offers you plenty of DOF capability, not to mention great advantage in low-light conditions. X-Pro1 will have its charm over the years to come.

  4. I am on holiday now in Cyprus and I have bought with me 23f2 and the 35f1.4 on the xt1. I just wanted to be free and light as it is not a photography holiday and I am finding I just shoot mainly with the 23 but the quality of my shots are better then taking the 18-55. Then I read your article and smiled. I have zooms and the 10-24mm but you don’t need all your gear all the time to have fun with your photography. A nice article and all subjective just depends on how you shoot I guess.

    1. Hi Richard,

      Of course it is all subjective, but this is what it is all about. Yes, the zooms have their strong points, but 2 small prime lenses also have very strong points, when you travel with a small bag and you stay in the comfort of having the best IQ and great low-light capabilities. Enjoy your holidays and take advantage of the warm evenings and nights – a great time to put 2 small, but great lenses to good use! Cheers!

  5. My lightweight 2-lens travel choice is the 23mm f/2 and the 50mm f/2, trading the faster speed of the 35mm f/1.4 for the longer focal length of the 50mm f/2.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: